Skip to content
  1. Do it online
  2. Login
  3. Have your say
  4. My Durham

Please note that our Modern.Gov system is currently unavailable - this affects all aspects of the democracy/committee section on our website, including Committee papers. We apologise for the inconvenience.

Productivity Plan


All councils in England are required to produce a Productivity Plan. Our Plan sets out how we will improve performance and reduce unnecessary spending.

Since 2010, we have had to make significant budget and staff savings, while dealing with a large increase in demand. Our plan builds on this work.

It will:

  • explain the key goals we are aiming for
  • explain how we will check we are achieving our goals
  • explain how we use our transformation programme to make better use of resources
  • show how we plan to take advantage of technology and data to make better decisions to deliver better services
  • explain what barriers we believe the Government could help us to reduce or remove

The plan signposts you to other useful documents that show how we plan to make improvements.

Our plan will be monitored as part of our existing performance management process.

Summary of our Productivity Plan 2024

We are a large unitary council, created in 2009, and believe that this is the most efficient, effective and cost-effective form of local governance. We have a long standing and proven approach to delivering financial savings, achieving £260 million and headcount reductions of 3,000 posts since 2010. We were Local Government Association (LGA) Council of the Year in 2014.

This plan consists of a framework of related and published documents. Examples of how our framework contributes to the questions set out by the Minister for Local Government are set out in the appendix to this plan.

Our approach is based around a strategic core of key activities which serves to provide strategic vision, a framework for delivery and strong local assurance. Through this approach we ensure proper arrangements to secure the '3 E's' of Value for Money on behalf of our residents and communities - Economy, Efficiency and Effectiveness.

  • County Durham Partnership: Vision 2035 - sets out how we will work in partnership to deliver improved outcomes
  • Council Plan - refreshed annually, focuses on priority actions over the same time period as the Medium Term Financial Plan (MTFP)
  • MTFP - is a four year plan, reviewed annually and developed with senior managers and elected members and delivered in line with public sector equality duties - see item 10, appendix four of the County Council agenda and minutes 28 February 2024 
  • Service planning - a process of plan, do, review is undertaken annually with a focus on actions for the coming 12 months including financial benchmarking
  • Intelligence and prioritisation - a data driven approach and assessment of needs available at Durham Insight
  • Workforce development programme to enable workforce optimisation and transformation - see item four of the Cabinet agenda and minutes 15 May 2024 
  • Council Performance monitoring - a corporate framework tailored to meet service specific needs:
    • regular performance reporting processes in services
    • quarterly performance reporting to Cabinet linked to our Council Plan and thematic scrutiny boards
    • focussed 'deep dive' activity
    • reporting through long standing, well embedded partnership board arrangements with our statutory and other partners

County Durham Vision pyramid

Council performance management

 

The Council Plan is aligned with the MTFP.

Detailed service and improvement plans are aligned to service budgets.

These are supported by major project plans which are assured through boards.

Quarterly assurance reports are presented to the Corporate Management Team (CMT), and quarterly performance reports are presented to CMT, Cabinet and Overview and Scrutiny.

  • Qualitative review - eg Office for Standards in Education, Children's Services and Skills (Ofsted) and Care Quality Commission (CQC) inspections and peer reviews  
  • Overview and scrutiny - ensuring public scrutiny that our strategy and delivery is effective and based upon community needs
  • Audit and assurance internal and external opinion that we are delivering in a way that is consistent with expected standards is outlined on our Statement of Accounts web page

Our estimates for savings requirements to set a balanced budget over the next four years (after assuming annual 2.99% increases in council tax) are currently circa £60 million including our transformation programme which is based around:

  • Targeted rapid improvement events based on lean/Six Sigma methodologies
  • Service specification reviews where we will be looking to redesign the service to a fixed price
  • Service transformation through demand management

Strategic planning and value for money diagram

Current approach to strategic planning and value for money

At the centre of our approach is community wellbeing. Our approach is cyclic:

Vision (ambitions and measures of success)

Intelligence (data, engagement and professional judgements)

Strategies (outcomes, improvement, priorities, actions and targets)

Delivery (project and services, outputs and standards)

Evaluation (effectiveness and VFM)

We achieve strategic planning through partnerships, and service planning delivery through collaboration, co-design and commissioning.

Full Productivity Plan 2024

How we have transformed the way we design and deliver services to make better use of resources

In 2010, we agreed a new MTFP strategy in response to the government's public spending reduction plans. This approach involved the prioritisation of savings from management, support services and from targeting efficiencies wherever possible, plus looking to maximise income from fees and charges. This was to minimise the impact on frontline services, particularly in those areas that protect basic needs and support vulnerable people. This approach, now in its 15th year, has delivered £262 million of savings to date and a leaner, more efficient workforce with 3,000 fewer employees engaged now than compared to 2010.

These reductions have been made against unprecedented increasing demand and increasing complexity of support requirements and public expectations in the face of a radically changed public service landscape. This follows prolonged periods of public spending restraint. For example, but not limited to:

MeasureBaseline periodBaselineCurrentIncrease
Children receiving support with home to school transport20199,30710,30611%
Children in need20102,8693,82733%
Children looked after20104911,213147%
Children with a statement of special educational need20102,2924,837111%
People presenting to us as homeless201480218172%
Residential care long-term support clients20142,0152,2009%

To manage this increase in demand and the scale of the budget reductions/pressures we have faced we have transformed service delivery. Initiatives that were implemented in pursuit of this strategy include:

  • reconfiguring previously distributed support services such as finance, HR, and policy, planning and performance into centralised and streamlined functions
  • rationalising our buildings including one of the largest community buildings asset transfer programmes in the country
  • the large scale voluntary transfer of council housing stock to a registered provider to free up capital and reduce our debt burden
  • the rationalisation of IT systems and investment in the digitisation of services including channel shift and the introduction of self-service pathways - a significant investment has also been made in transforming our data
  • the introduction of new models of partnership working with other public and voluntary sector providers on a range of services such as housing and homelessness, community safety, children's safeguarding, poverty alleviation and the integration of health and social care services

Productivity improvements alone will not balance the budget. Complex savings proposals require service cuts, and most services operate at or near statutory minimum standards. We struggle due to low tax revenue and insufficient income, to meet inflation and growing demand.

Our Council Plan sets out how we will deliver the outcomes in our shared County Durham Partnership: Vision 2035. This is based on a strategic assessment of need using our intelligence platform Durham Insight which includes our Durham Insight: Joint Strategic Needs and Assets Assessment. The plan sets out a comprehensive set of measures including Office for Local Government (Oflog) indicators which we use to monitor our progress, though we oppose the use of Band D comparators and advocate the use the average actual council tax paid in each area as a much more relevant. We benchmark ourselves against other organisations and identify areas for improvement and are subject to rigorous challenge as part of our Overview and scrutiny arrangements. Performance is published on our Council Performance page. Rigorous service planning is in place across the council which includes value for money (VFM) profiling which is used to identify good practice and improvement opportunities.

We work closely with the National Health Service (NHS) and have an Integrated Strategic Commissioning function between ourselves for social care and public health and with NHS North East and North Cumbria Integrated Care Board. We have several joint council/NHS appointments and long standing integrated teams of NHS and council staff based in the same offices and working together with health and social care clients.

Our Durham Safeguarding Children Partnership: Multi-Agency Safeguarding Hub is made up of professionals from a range of agencies including us, the police, health agencies, education, Harbour and Humankind. All these agencies work with us and sit alongside our social workers in a single location.

We have strived to make savings, both as a single agency and across systems within the county, from back office functions and management posts and minimise the impacts on the front line. We have had to make changes to eligibility criteria and managed reductions in some services which will have impacted on residents and client groups. We have asset transferred a number of facilities to community groups and to local parish councils.

After 15 years, we recognise that there are no easy savings to achieve. All future transformation plans will be complex. We have set out our savings programme in our four year MTFP, see item 10, appendix four of the County Council agenda and minutes 28 February 2024. Areas of high demand and cost are prioritised for 2026/27 savings. High complexity transformation projects, such as community based and system wide demand management are scheduled for 2027/28 and beyond. We will consider new delivery models where it makes sense to do so. We have set out what the government can do to help manage demand through reform to the current system which has baked in increased demand or suboptimal ways of working.

We will build on our transformation track record, monitoring success through savings, demand reduction, and improved productivity. We have robust governance mechanisms in place to ensure the delivery of our transformation programme, see item nine of the Audit Committee agenda and minutes 23 May 2023.

Areas that we have prioritised for exploration for 2026/27 and 2027/28 include:

  • targeted rapid improvement events based on lean/Six Sigma methodologies
  • service specification reviews where we will be looking to redesign the service to a fixed price
  • service transformation through demand management
  • the use of transformation enablers such as new technologies and AI

How we plan to take advantage of technology and make better use of data to improve decision making, service design and use of resources

We have an ambition to become a more data-driven organisation which is set out in our Data and Insight Strategy 2023/24 - 2025/26 (PDF) [478KB] . We have a programme to create a cloud-based data and analytics platform that ingests data from our business systems. This will provide us with a single version of the truth through a series of automated analytics products providing information and analysis to managers to support better decision-making and targeting of resources. We will also be able to link together previously disparate datasets and provide single views such as a single view of the child, the adult, the family and of debt.

The implementation of our strategy will help us move towards diagnostic and predictive analytics and inform our approaches to prevention, demand management and system redesign with partners.

Data is routinely shared between partners such as police, NHS, fire and registered housing providers to pursue multi-agency solutions to issues such as safeguarding, community safety and Special Educational Needs (SEN). However, this could be further improved if data protection legislation made data sharing less complex across public service providers. 

We have used both robotic and process automation to improve the efficiency of a range of business processes. Uses include supplementing the functionality of and providing integration between core systems and external organisations, and carrying out high-quantity, low-complexity data entry tasks at times of peak demand. 

We have also embarked on a programme to explore three proof of concept projects around using artificial intelligence to improve productivity in the workplace. These include automated minute taking and recording actions, automating processes and translating documents into foreign languages.

Our plans to reduce spending within our organisation and systems

We have governance structures in place to ensure openness, transparency and challenge around accountability of spend and performance. Our budget, MTFP and Council Plan are robustly scrutinised before approval by Council. We monitor progress against these plans through regular reports to scrutiny committees on budget, performance and progress in making savings. We have a long history of strong financial management, evidenced by a consistently publishing our draft accounts by 31 May each year on our Statement of Accounts page and by unqualified opinion on our financial statements including favourable commentary around value for money arrangements. We are open to challenge and support and commissioned CIPFA to carry out an independent finance review in August 2023 resulting in a final score of 3.25 against their four-star rating system, see item 11 of the Audit Committee agenda and minutes 29 February 2024. We have also committed to undertake an LGA corporate peer challenge in 2025. Ofsted graded us as good overall and outstanding in the leadership category on our last Ofsted: Durham County Council's Children Services in May 2022. We have voluntarily undertaken a number of peer challenges and reviews including accreditation with the Chartered Institute of Payroll Professionals, a suicide prevention peer review, Association of Directors of Public Health (ADPH) sector-led improvement around drugs and physical activity, CLeaR (an evidence-based approach to system improvement) review of alcohol and tobacco, a rapid review of local outbreak management plans, Newton Europe deep dive into adult social care, North East and Yorkshire Region NHS Discharge Taskforce assurance visit, No.10 Delivery Unit visit looking at best practice, strategic review of enablement services, LGA peer review of communications and marketing, LGA peer review of community safety partnership and a planned LGA peer review of highway service.

Our estimates for savings requirements to set a balanced budget over the next four years are provisionally over £60 million including our transformation programme, are set out in our MTFP, see item 10, appendix four of the County Council agenda and minutes 28 February 2024. However, increasing demand could increase this figure substantially.

How we use capital spending to transform existing services and unlock new opportunities is set out in our capital strategy, see item 10, appendix nine of the County Council agenda and minutes 28 February 2024. Bids for inclusion in our capital programme are assessed against a range of criteria linked to the Council Plan and prioritised accordingly. A major consideration is affordability which takes into account the availability of capital financing, the impact of borrowing and increased running costs on revenue budgets.

Investment is targeted towards supporting our corporate priorities outlined in our  Durham County Council Plan 2024-2028 (PDF) [4MB]  and we have the largest capital programme in our history which is delivering better facilities and economic opportunities across the County eg new and refurbished leisure and cultural venues which are forecast to generate additional income to the council and contribute to the prevention agenda around mental and physical health.

We have also focussed our capital projects at delivering revenue savings which over time can be re-invested back into frontline services. For example, we have delivered numerous schemes around retrofitting council buildings with renewable energy sources, more efficient heating systems, insulation and Light-Emitting Diode (LED) lighting to help contribute towards our target to reduce the council's carbon emissions to net zero by 2030. This is also an example of a self-financing scheme where the £40 million investment is more than paid for by reductions in energy costs.

A key priority of the capital programme also continues to be regeneration and job creation within the local economy. Investment in town centres, business parks, road schemes and our decision to demolish County Hall to free up prime business space to create up to 4,000 new jobs and relocate our headquarters are all examples of schemes to support this corporate priority. Examples, which are also self-financing, include Jade Park with 2,500 jobs, the extension of NETPark creating 1,700 new jobs, Salvus House and the purchase of Newgate Shopping Centre which all have a payback through increased rental income and have made a significant contribution to our carbon targets.

Some schemes are aimed at cost avoidance such as the building of eight children's homes which have lower placement costs than the private sector or the buying of houses to be used for temporary accommodation of homeless people.

Our revenue spend also has a strong focus on preventative approaches which reduce or delay the need to invest in more expensive interventions. Our edge of care support service provides intensive social care interventions to young people, parents and carers where there has been a relationship breakdown to avoid young people unnecessarily entering the care system or undergoing a placement move. Successful interventions can be quantified in terms of cost avoidance using average placement costs and placement move costs.

Our Stronger Families Programme provides stability and support for people to overcome complex issues including worklessness, debt, anti-social behaviour, and truancy. Durham is one of a small number of councils that has earned autonomy status which rewards us for each family on the programme achieving significant or sustained change.

Our Homelessness and Rough Sleeping Strategy focuses on prevention and early intervention, see item four, appendix two of Cabinet agenda and minutes - 11 October 2023. We can prevent homelessness and the cost of alternative accommodation or temporary accommodation by providing financial incentives and support to help people remain in their current home.

We set out our clear focus on prevention in our Joint Local Health and Wellbeing Strategy. We commission many preventative public health interventions which are designed to reduce wider costs to the public purse in areas such as smoking cessation, drug and alcohol treatment services, smoking in pregnancy and breastfeeding initiation.

Our 14 Area Action Partnerships give local people and organisations a say on how our services are provided. These partnerships consist of members of the public, councillors, town and parish councils, police, fire, health, housing, business and voluntary organisations. They identify local priorities and actions required to tackle them and provide funding and support to communities. 

The barriers preventing progress that the Government can help to reduce or remove

  • Return to multiple financial year settlements - this would provide stability and certainty and allow councils to effectively plan their budgets and capital programmes.
  • End the costly funding regime - we spend £millions preparing bids for funding pots and on complex monitoring and reporting arrangements. It is inefficient and unfair. We spent over £1 million on five levelling up bids only to be told later that we were not eligible for this funding due to a rule change. Ending this 'begging bowl' approach by mainstreaming funding into a single grant distribution, reducing cost and giving flexibility through the removal of ring fencing which allows more local decision making.
  • Reform the adult social care precept - children's social care costs are growing at an unsustainable level. Changing the adult social care precept to a social care precept would allow councils the flexibility to use funding to tackle these growing pressures.
  • Business rates reset - the business rates retention scheme needs to be reset to reduce some of the complexity that has built up within the system. Delaying this reset, that was promised in 2020, has allowed some of the least deprived areas in the country with high growth in their business base to retain millions of pounds that could more effectively be used if redistributed in the system.
  • Increase the quantum of local government funding - funding to maintain services at current levels does not address existing underfunding, nor does it include funding to improve or expand council services. Local government has seen their funding cut in real terms by more than 18% since 2010 and at the same time, demand in children's social care, (Special Educational Needs and Disabilities) SEND and home to school transport has grown significantly.
  • Fair Funding Review - the formulas used to distribute local government funding are out of date and have gradually shifted over time to distribute less funding on a needs-basis. The data and formulae used to distribute funding need to be updated to ensure that distribution of funding to local authorities is fair, takes account of deprivation and need and does not further widen the gap between poorer and wealthier authorities.
  • Consider options for wider reform of the local taxation system - we are restricted in how much local taxation we can generate due to low local property prices and a low council tax base and having a large university student population who are exempt from paying council tax.
  • Regulate the children's social care market - spiraling social care placement costs are placing huge pressures on our finances. Market regulation could relieve the pressure on council budgets and prevent profiteering.
  • The system for supporting homeless people placed outside the area to ensure that the hosting council does not suffer financial detriment in terms of housing subsidy and increased costs of demand for other local services.
  • Reform home to school transport entitlement to make it more proportionate and affordable.
  • Address issues in the system for children and young people with SEND created by the Children and Families Act 2014 by increasing funding to meet eligibility criteria or reducing eligibility criteria to make it more proportionate and affordable.
  • Reform adult social care funding - the current funding mechanism for adult social care is neither sustainable nor fair for the most deprived local authorities. Social care funding needs to be reformed so that it is based on social care need in a local council area and not based on residents' ability to pay the social care precept.
  • Data protection regulations around Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) and NHS data are too restrictive and prohibit data being shared which would be beneficial to our residents and service users. For instance, compelling DWP to share data would enable automated processing and aid productivity in areas such as blue badges, benefit claimants etc.
  • Remove the requirement for Mayors to access the highest devolution benefits.

Other information

In the minister's guidance around content of Productivity Plans, there were a number of specific questions around equality, diversity and inclusion; agency workers; consultants and trade union facilities time.

  • Equality, diversity and inclusion (EDI) - our spend on EDI is to meet requirements of the Public Sector Equality Duty including programmes designed to promote integration and civic pride, and counter extremism and our requirement to pay due regard to equality obligations around policy and service change. We have two mandatory staff elearning courses on discrimination and harassment and victimisation taking 20-30 minutes each to complete. These set out staff members' legal responsibilities. We have a corporate director who is also EDI champion for our staff networks and a councillor who is the portfolio holder for equality and inclusion while also helping to improve employment opportunities for disabled people.
  • Agency workers - we spend the equivalent of 1.5% of our pay bill on agency staff to supplement our workforce and smooth over peaks in frontline demand and planned absences and vacancies.
  • Consultants - the equivalent of 5.4% of our pay bill is spent on consultancy where we lack either the capacity or the capability in-house to carry out the work ourselves.
  • Trade union facility time - 0.0711% of our pay bill is spent on Trade Union Facility Time


Share this page

Share this page on Facebook Share this page on Facebook Share this page on Twitter Share this page on Twitter